Best OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) Alternatives in 2026
Updated
20 apps from test automation software ranked against OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) on the same published basis.
- 1OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) vs Firebase Cloud Messaging
- 2OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) vs TestingWhiz
- 3OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) vs Parasoft SOAtest
- 4OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) vs ACCELQ
- 5OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) vs Testsigma
- 6OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) vs AWS Device Farm
- 7OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) vs BrowserStack Automate
- 8OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) vs Keysight Eggplant Test
- 9OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) vs TestArchitect
- 10OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) vs Kobiton
- 11OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) vs Perfecto Test Analytics
- 12OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) vs Cucumber.js
- 13OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) vs HyperExecute
- 14OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) vs BugBug
- 15OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) vs CloudQA
- 16OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) vs Codeception
- 17OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) vs Functionize
- 18OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) vs Wopee.io
- 19OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) vs Usetrace
- 20OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) vs KronoDesk
OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) alternatives compared
| # | App | Score | Free plan | From | Runs on |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Firebase Cloud Messaging | 7.8 | Free plan | Free | Android, API, Browser, iOS, Web |
| 2 | TestingWhiz | 7.8 | Free plan | Free | Android, Browser, iOS, Linux, Mac, Windows |
| 3 | Parasoft SOAtest | 7.2 | No | — | Android, API, iOS, Linux, Mac, self-hosted, Windows |
| 4 | ACCELQ | 7.1 | No | — | Android, API, iOS, Linux, Mac, self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| 5 | Testsigma | 7.1 | No | $14/mo | Android, API, iOS, Linux, Mac, self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| 6 | AWS Device Farm | 7.0 | No | $200/mo | Android, API, iOS, Web |
| 7 | BrowserStack Automate | 7.0 | No | $59/mo | Android, API, iOS, Mac, Web, Windows |
| 8 | Keysight Eggplant Test | 7.0 | No | — | Android, API, iOS, Linux, Mac, Web, Windows |
| 9 | TestArchitect | 7.0 | No | — | Android, API, iOS, Linux, self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| 10 | Kobiton | 6.9 | No | $83/mo | Android, API, iOS, self-hosted, Web |
| 11 | Perfecto Test Analytics | 6.5 | No | — | Android, iOS, Web |
| 12 | Cucumber.js | 6.3 | Free plan | Free | Linux, Mac, self-hosted, Windows |
| 13 | HyperExecute | 6.3 | Free plan | $103,129/mo | API, Linux, Mac, self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| 14 | BugBug | 6.2 | Free plan | $99/mo | API, Browser, Web |
| 15 | CloudQA | 6.2 | Free plan | $11,999/mo | API, Linux, Mac, self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| 16 | Codeception | 6.2 | Free plan | Free | Linux, Mac, self-hosted, Windows |
| 17 | Functionize | 6.2 | Free plan | $20/mo | Web |
| 18 | Wopee.io | 6.1 | Free plan | €19/mo | Web |
| 19 | Usetrace | 5.7 | No | — | API, Web |
| 20 | KronoDesk | 5.6 | No | $195.76/mo | API |
Make your app an alternative to OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One)
See the priceThe sponsored alternative slot on this page is labelled Sponsored.
Questions about OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) alternatives
What is the best alternative to OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One)?
Firebase Cloud Messaging, number 1 in test automation software with a score of 7.8 out of 10. The others here: TestingWhiz, Parasoft SOAtest, ACCELQ and 16 more.
What is the best free alternative to OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One)?
Firebase Cloud Messaging is the best-ranked alternative with a free plan. 9 of the 20 alternatives here publish a free plan on their own pricing pages.
How are these alternatives ranked?
Ranked mobile-first: a phone app alongside the web or desktop product, a free tier and the depth of its documentation.





























