- Home
- Performance Testing Software
- Apica LoadTest
Apica LoadTest
Apica’s privacy policy identifies its headquarters as Malmskillnadsgatan 32, 111 51, Stockholm, Sweden.
What it is
Apica LoadTest creates, runs, and analyzes capacity and performance tests for web and cloud applications. Its browser-based portal supports scripting, setup, execution, analysis, and reporting without requiring local software downloads. Users can create or upload HTTP/S scripts, choose geographic test clusters, and use managed infrastructure for execution and scheduling, reporting, analysis, and collaboration storage. The service covers load, stress, distributed load, and API testing, with browser, API, transaction, and journey checks. Apica says its premium network supports tests of up to 2,000,000 concurrent users. Documentation also describes device testing for iPhone, Android, iPad, and Windows, including native mobile applications. Listed integrations include AWS Code Pipeline, TeamCity, Jenkins, and Azure DevOps. It connects with ZebraTester for script and result transfers; ZebraTester can also run on customer infrastructure. A free plan and a 30-day full-featured trial are listed. Apica was founded in 2005 and is headquartered in Stockholm, Sweden.
For and against
For
- Browser portal needs no local software downloads.
- Supports load, stress, distributed load, and API testing.
- Geographic clusters can be selected for tests.
- Integrates with Jenkins, TeamCity, and Azure DevOps.
- Free plan and 30-day trial are listed.
Against
- Premium network capacity is stated, not as a general plan limit.
The verdict
Apica LoadTest combines performance testing with several types of checks and integrations.
Who it suits
It suits teams evaluating application and API performance across web, cloud, and mobile contexts. Organizations needing expert help can also consider Apica's full-service testing projects.
Plans and prices
Self Service Portal
On-demand platform access · Apica load testing network
Read 9 Oct 2026 · docs.apica.io
On the record
- Browser access
- The portal is accessed through a browser and does not require local software downloads.docs.apica.io · read 9 Oct 2026
- Integrations
- The documentation lists AWS Code Pipeline, TeamCity, Jenkins, and Azure DevOps as examples of third-party integrations.docs.apica.io · read 9 Oct 2026
- Load capacity
- Apica says its premium load test network supports tests of up to 2,000,000 concurrent users.docs.apica.io · read 9 Oct 2026
- Mobile testing
- The documentation describes device testing for iPhone, Android, iPad, and Windows, as well as native mobile applications.docs.apica.io · read 9 Oct 2026
- Portal capabilities
- The portal provides managed infrastructure, execution and scheduling, reporting and analysis, and collaboration storage.docs.apica.io · read 9 Oct 2026
- Purpose
- Apica LoadTest creates, runs, and analyzes capacity and performance tests for web and cloud applications.docs.apica.io · read 9 Oct 2026
- Security and compliance
- Apica’s Trust & Security Center says the company holds ISO 27001 and SOC 2 certifications and lists PCI DSS under compliance.trust.apica.io · read 9 Oct 2026
- Support and services
- Apica offers full-service projects in which its experts design, script, and execute tests and work with customers to analyze and improve performance.docs.apica.io · read 9 Oct 2026
- Test scripts
- Users can create or upload HTTP/S load test scripts and select geographic test clusters.docs.apica.io · read 9 Oct 2026
- Trial
- An Apica blog page invites users to start a 30-day full-featured trial of Apica LoadTest.apica.io · read 9 Oct 2026
- Workflow
- Its documented workflow covers scripting, setup, building, running, analysis, and reporting.docs.apica.io · read 9 Oct 2026
- ZebraTester
- Apica LoadTest integrates with ZebraTester so scripts and results can be uploaded and downloaded between them; ZebraTester can also run standalone on a customer’s infrastructure.docs.apica.io · read 9 Oct 2026
The review
Overview
Apica LoadTest is a browser-based service for creating, executing, and interpreting capacity and performance tests for web and cloud applications. It is best suited to engineering, QA, and performance teams that need managed test infrastructure and pipeline connections rather than a purely local tool. Its broad testing scope is compelling, but buyers should match their expected scale and operating model to the subscription terms.
Key features
The service follows a complete testing process: scripting, environment setup, test construction, execution, analysis, and reporting. Because the portal runs in a browser, users do not need to install local client software. Managed infrastructure, scheduling, result analysis, reporting, and shared storage put coordination in one place, which is useful when several contributors must review the same test work.
Teams can write or upload HTTP/S load scripts and select geographic clusters for execution. Apica says its premium load-test network handles tests of up to 2,000,000 concurrent users. That is a substantial upper bound for major capacity programs, although the premium-network qualification means it should not be treated as an automatic entitlement on every subscription or workload.
Beyond conventional load tests, the platform supports stress tests, distributed load, and API testing. Browser, API, transaction, and journey checks extend coverage from isolated endpoints to user-facing flows. Documentation also describes testing on iPhone, Android, iPad, and Windows devices, including native mobile applications, making the service relevant to teams validating mobile as well as web experiences.
Pipeline work can connect with AWS Code Pipeline, TeamCity, Jenkins, and Azure DevOps. ZebraTester integration allows scripts and results to move between the two products, while ZebraTester can run independently on a customer's own infrastructure. For organizations that want assistance instead of only tooling, Apica offers full-service engagements in which its specialists design and script tests, run them, and help analyze and improve performance.
Pricing
The documented Self Service Portal is billed by subscription each month, with on-demand access to Apica's load-testing network; its price is custom. That arrangement suits teams that want hosted access without committing to a fixed annual term, but it makes direct budget comparison difficult until Apica quotes the required capacity.
A 30-day full-featured trial gives prospective customers a meaningful window to evaluate the workflow and integrations before paying. The cheaper or free route is appropriate for initial exploration and smaller exercises; organizations planning large distributed runs, substantial concurrency, or sustained test programs should confirm quotas and network access in the subscription proposal rather than assume the premium ceiling applies.
Platforms
Apica LoadTest is delivered through the web and supports API, Android, and iOS use cases. Linux and self-hosted options are also represented, giving teams that need infrastructure flexibility a path beyond a browser-only deployment. The hybrid deployment model is a fit for organizations combining hosted execution with systems kept under their own control.
Who it's for
Choose Apica when a team needs one managed workspace for load, stress, distributed, API, browser, transaction, and journey checks, especially when tests must be scheduled across geographic clusters or connected to CI/CD systems. Its mobile coverage and optional expert services also suit organizations with native-app performance programs or limited in-house performance-testing capacity.
It is less suitable when the priority is a permanently free, self-contained tool with transparent limits. The custom monthly pricing and unspecified free-plan allowances require a purchasing conversation, and teams that only need straightforward local scripting may not benefit from the portal's managed-service breadth.
Pros and cons
- Pro: A lifecycle-oriented portal combines execution, scheduling, analysis, reporting, and collaboration storage.
- Pro: HTTP/S scripting, geographic clusters, mobile-device coverage, and multiple check types cover diverse web and app programs.
- Pro: Integrations with AWS Code Pipeline, TeamCity, Jenkins, and Azure DevOps support automated delivery workflows.
- Pro: Optional full-service projects provide expert help with design, scripting, execution, and performance improvement.
- Con: Self Service Portal pricing is custom and monthly, so forecasting cost requires a quote.
- Con: The 2,000,000-user figure applies to the premium network, not necessarily to every plan or scenario.
Alternatives
Tricentis Testim is a better fit for teams wanting a free tier capped at 1,000 runs per month, with paid mobile and web testing priced to requirements.
Keysight Eggplant Test suits enterprise buyers seeking a quoted product with no free plan and broad desktop, mobile, API, and web platform coverage.
LoadFocus is worth considering when API monitoring is the priority and a free allowance of 10,000 checks per month, five-minute frequency, and one-month retention is sufficient.
LoadView offers a free on-demand option for single tests with unlimited concurrent HTTP, browser, and parallel testing.
Taurus and Apache JMeter are free, open-source choices for teams comfortable running their own tooling; JMeter requires Java 8 or later.
Artillery provides a paid Team plan at $199 a month with 1,000 reports monthly, six months of retention, eight team members, and up to 25 workers per distributed test.
Verdict
Apica LoadTest is a strong choice for organizations that want managed, scalable performance testing with mobile coverage, pipeline integrations, and optional expert delivery. Look elsewhere if transparent low-cost pricing, fully open-source operation, or clearly published free-plan limits matter more than an integrated hosted platform.