ScanDog

ScanDog is an application security posture management product that brings security findings together and turns them into context-aware recommendations. Its coverage includes SAST, SCA, DAST, infrastructure-as-code, secret and container scanning, and SBOM management. Findings can be prioritized using EPSS, KEV, exploitability, reachability, and business impact, with support for deduplication, remediation workflows, policy gates, and ticketing sync. AI remediation offers minimal diffs and safe refactors intended to preserve behavior and tests. ScanDog says that when AI is used, it receives only narrow snippets around an issue rather than the full codebase. Listed connections include GitHub, GitLab, Azure DevOps, Jira, Linear, Slack, Microsoft Teams, and scanners such as Snyk, Semgrep, Trivy, and OWASP ZAP. The product page lists exportable audit reports and compliance mapping. It is available via web and API. Free costs nothing and is limited to three products, 10 workflows, two users, and 30 AI fixes per month. Team costs €19/user/mo (annual) and allows up to 10 products, 200 workflows, 30 users, and 200 monthly AI fixes. Google Chat notifications are marked coming soon.

ScanDog brings multiple security finding sources into a prioritization and remediation workflow. Its Free plan has published product, workflow, user, and AI-fix limits; Team is billed annually.

The Free plan is described for individual developers, security enthusiasts, and IT professionals. Team is positioned for growing security teams in mid-sized organizations.

ScanDog is a cloud application security platform that brings findings from multiple scanners into a prioritized remediation workflow. It is best suited to developers and growing security teams coordinating security work across products. Its broad coverage is useful, but the Free and Team caps make capacity a key part of the buying decision.

Overview

ScanDog brings together findings from SAST, SCA, DAST, infrastructure-as-code, secret and container scanning, and SBOM management. It uses EPSS, KEV, exploitability, reachability, and business impact to help teams judge which issues warrant attention first. Deduplication, policy gates, remediation workflows, and ticketing sync support the work that follows prioritization.

This approach suits teams juggling multiple scanners and repositories: it offers a shared place to organize findings and follow-up. AI remediation proposes minimal diffs and safe refactors intended to preserve behavior and tests. ScanDog says AI receives only narrow snippets around an issue, rather than the full codebase. The monthly AI-fix quotas still matter for teams that expect to use assisted fixes frequently.

Key features

• Wide security coverage: The combination of code, dependency, dynamic, infrastructure, secret, and container scanning with SBOM management can help teams consolidate varied findings in one workflow.
• Risk-based prioritization: EPSS, KEV, exploitability, reachability, and business impact give teams several signals for assessing urgency. That breadth can aid triage, though it does not remove the need for teams to decide how those signals apply to their systems.
• Remediation coordination: Deduplication, policy gates, remediation workflows, and ticketing sync support consistent follow-up across findings.
• AI-assisted fixes: Minimal diffs and safe refactors are intended to preserve behavior and tests. The narrow-snippet handling ScanDog describes may suit teams assessing code exposure, while the monthly fix cap can constrain heavier use.
• Integrations: GitHub, GitLab, Azure DevOps, Jira, Linear, Slack, Microsoft Teams, Snyk, Semgrep, Trivy, and OWASP ZAP are listed. Google Chat notifications for pull requests and findings are marked coming soon.
• Audit and compliance support: Exportable audit reports and compliance mapping can help teams with reporting workflows. ScanDog also displays a GDPR-compliant badge.

Pricing

ScanDog has a Free plan at no cost, with 3 products, 10 workflows, 2 users, and 30 AI fixes per month. Email support is included. Those caps make it a reasonable starting point for an individual developer or small evaluation, but they leave little room for a larger team or a portfolio of products.

Team costs €19 a month, billed annually. It includes up to 10 products, 200 workflows, up to 30 users, and 200 AI fixes per month, with email support. This is the natural fit for a growing security team in a mid-sized organization that can work within those ceilings. The annual billing term and per-month AI quota are important constraints for teams comparing budget and expected usage.

Enterprise has custom pricing and includes unlimited products, workflows, users, and AI fixes per month, plus dedicated support. It is the better fit when Team's published ceilings or support arrangement are too restrictive, though buyers will need a custom quote.

Platforms

ScanDog is offered as a cloud service with web and API access. Teams requiring a self-hosted deployment should consider alternatives that publish that option.

Who it's for

ScanDog is strongest for individual developers, security enthusiasts, and IT professionals starting with the Free plan, or growing security teams that want to coordinate findings across scanners and can fit within Team's product, workflow, user, and AI-fix limits. Teams needing unlimited capacity and dedicated support should evaluate Enterprise. It is a weaker fit for organizations that require self-hosting or need more than Team allows without custom pricing.

Pros and cons

Pros

• Broad coverage in one workflow: The listed scanning categories and SBOM management make it relevant beyond a single scanner type.
• Multiple prioritization signals: EPSS, KEV, exploitability, reachability, and business impact support more contextual triage than an undifferentiated alert queue.
• Useful entry point: Free includes 2 users and email support, so a small team can begin without a subscription.
• Clear AI-fix privacy boundary: ScanDog says AI receives narrow snippets around issues rather than the full codebase.

Cons

• Free is tightly capped: 3 products, 10 workflows, 2 users, and 30 AI fixes per month can quickly limit a team with broader needs.
• Team requires annual billing: Its €19 a month price is billed annually, and the plan still caps products, workflows, users, and AI fixes.
• Enterprise pricing is custom: Teams needing unlimited capacity and dedicated support cannot compare a published price.
• No self-hosted option is listed for ScanDog: Its cloud deployment may not suit organizations that require infrastructure under their own control.

Alternatives

Browse application security orchestration platforms to compare other products in this category.

• ArcherySec is a strong alternative for teams seeking a free, GPL-3.0-licensed, self-hosted option with API, web, and desktop operating-system platforms.
• Conviso Platform may suit teams comparing a freemium option with a Free plan capped at 5 contributing developers, 5 assets, 10 users, and 2 integrations.
• OWASP DefectDojo is worth considering for teams that want a free, open-source Community Edition with support through OWASP Slack and GitHub, or prefer its listed Pay As You Go plan.
• Strobes ASPM may suit teams whose needs fit its Free plan of up to 100 assets, 500 tasks per month, and one connector, with ASM, RBVM, and ASPM included.
• Harness Security Testing Orchestration is another web-based option for teams evaluating a paid product with Harness Open Source and Litmus Chaos included in its Free Plan.
• PointGuard AI is another paid, web-based option.
• ClearAnts ASOC is another paid option.
• CyanoRisk API Security Posture Management is another paid option with API and self-hosted platforms.

Verdict

Choose ScanDog if you want a cloud workflow that brings several kinds of security findings together, prioritizes them with multiple risk signals, and supports remediation across a growing team. Its Free plan gives small users a practical entry point, while Team adds substantial capacity at €19 a month billed annually. Look elsewhere if you need self-hosting, expect to exceed Team's quotas, or need a published Enterprise price before evaluating a larger deployment.