Conviso Platform

Conviso Platform centralizes application security context and vulnerabilities to help organizations run AppSec programs at scale. It organizes assets, consolidates vulnerability findings, and connects architectural threats with results from tests and scans. Listed testing features include SAST, DAST, IAST, SCA, and container testing. The cloud-based platform is available through web and API, with no on-premises deployment option. Integrations include GitHub, GitLab, Jenkins, Jira, Slack, Snyk, Semgrep, ServiceNow, and Microsoft Teams. Its GraphQL API works with projects, vulnerabilities, and scans, with a documented limit of 1,200 requests per minute. AppSec Agent AI is available to Developers plan users and is described as supporting diagnostics and fixes during development. Conviso says it is certified in ISO 27001 and ISO 20000 standards. The free plan allows up to five contributing developers, five assets, 10 users, and two integrations. Developers pricing starts at $19 a month per contributing developer, billed at $2,040 per year, with a 12-month minimum contract.

Conviso Platform brings several AppSec findings and tools into a shared cloud service, with a free tier for small setups. Review the contributor-based pricing and annual billing commitment before choosing Developers.

Conviso Platform suits organizations building or operating an application security program, from startups to large corporations. Teams needing centralized vulnerability context and integrations with development tools may find its capabilities relevant.

Conviso Platform is a cloud-based application security platform for teams coordinating assets, vulnerabilities, and testing across repositories. It is best suited to organizations building a shared AppSec program; the free tier accommodates small setups, while the paid plan’s 12-month minimum is a significant commitment.

Overview

Conviso organizes assets, consolidates vulnerabilities, and connects architectural threats with findings from tests and scans. Remediation workflows, finding correlation, ownership mapping, risk prioritization, and SBOM management make it a program-level tool rather than just a place to collect scan results. That shared view can help teams connect findings to ownership and remediation, but organizations seeking on-premises control should look elsewhere: deployment is cloud-only.

Conviso says it is certified in ISO 27001 and ISO 20000 standards. Founded in 2008 and headquartered in Curitiba, Brazil, it serves organizations from startups to large corporations.

Key features

Testing and risk context

The platform’s testing scope includes SAST, DAST, IAST, SCA, and container testing. Bringing these findings together with assets and architectural threats gives AppSec teams a basis for prioritizing work in context. Its value is strongest where teams need to coordinate multiple testing streams; organizations seeking only a narrowly scoped scanner may not need this broader program layer.

Development workflows and integrations

Listed integrations include GitHub, GitLab, Jenkins, Jira, Slack, Snyk, Semgrep, ServiceNow, and Microsoft Teams. This range connects the platform with repository, testing, issue-management, and collaboration tools, although the fit depends on whether a team’s existing stack is represented.

The AppSec Agent AI is available to Developers plan users and is described as providing diagnostics, fixes, and support within the development cycle. Teams that want this assistance need the paid plan, rather than Free.

API and security

The GraphQL API supports queries and mutations for projects, vulnerabilities, and scans, with a documented limit of 1,200 requests per minute. That offers a defined route for teams automating work around those objects. Conviso also says it is certified in ISO 27001 and ISO 20000 standards.

Pricing

Conviso uses a freemium model. Free costs nothing and allows up to 5 contributing developers, 5 assets, 10 users, and 2 integrations. It is a useful fit for a small team assessing the platform, but the developer, asset, and integration caps constrain broader rollout. Free includes a 48-hour SLA.

Developers is listed at $19 a month, billed $2,040 charged per year, and priced from U$19 per contributing developer per month. It includes unlimited assets, users, and integrations, AppSec Agent AI, and a 24-hour SLA. This is the better fit for teams expanding across repositories and users, but it is not a month-to-month trial: the minimum contract is 12 months. Monthly or annual payment options are offered, with a stated 20% discount for annual payments.

Contributing developers are counted by commits to associated repositories in the preceding 30 days, so the billable count follows recent repository activity. Teams should account for that measure alongside the annual billing amount before moving beyond Free.

Platforms

Conviso Platform is available via API and web. It is cloud-based, with no on-premises deployment option, which rules it out for organizations that require self-hosted deployment.

Who it's for

Conviso is a fit for organizations that need to relate application assets, architectural threats, and findings from several testing approaches, then route remediation across development workflows. Smaller teams can start within Free’s narrow caps. Teams scaling users, assets, or integrations should consider Developers only if its 12-month minimum contract and contributor-based pricing suit their budget and repository activity.

Pros and cons

Pros

• Free covers up to 5 contributing developers, 5 assets, 10 users, and 2 integrations, giving small teams room to assess a shared AppSec workflow without a paid plan.
• Asset context, vulnerability consolidation, threat links, ownership mapping, and risk prioritization support more coordinated remediation than isolated scan results.
• Developers removes asset, user, and integration limits and includes AI assistance for development-cycle diagnostics and fixes.
• The GraphQL API supports project, vulnerability, and scan operations with a documented 1,200-requests-per-minute limit.

Cons

• Free’s low asset and contributor caps limit its usefulness for larger programs.
• The 12-month minimum contract makes a paid commitment less flexible, even though monthly payment is an option.
• Contributing developers are counted by commits in the prior 30 days, so the relevant billable count is tied to recent repository activity.
• Cloud-only deployment excludes teams that require an on-premises option.

Alternatives

Strobes ASPM is worth considering for teams that want a free tier allowing up to 100 assets and 500 tasks per month, plus self-hosted availability; its free plan includes ASM, RBVM, ASPM, one connector, and community support.

Phoenix Security may suit teams that need a larger free asset allowance: Phoenix Free covers up to 1,000 assets, two premium users plus guests, and dashboard reporting, with community support.

SecurStack is an alternative for teams prioritizing a capped scanning allowance: its free plan includes 500 scan credits per month, three users, ten projects, and SAST, SCA, and secrets scanning.

OX Security is another application security option to compare.

Cycode ASPM is another paid ASPM option, with no free plan.

Legit Security ASPM is a paid alternative whose pricing and package details require contacting sales.

Seemplicity Application Security is another paid application security option to compare.

Veracode Risk Manager is a paid alternative; contact Veracode or request a demo for pricing.

Browse Application Security Posture Management Software or Application Security Orchestration Platforms to compare more options.

Verdict

Choose Conviso Platform if your organization needs a shared view of assets, threats, and security findings across testing and development workflows. Its free tier is a credible starting point for small setups, while Developers removes key capacity caps and adds AI assistance. Look elsewhere if you need on-premises deployment or cannot accept a 12-month paid commitment.