PeerEval

PeerEval is a peer assessment tool for classroom evaluations, running on the web with an iPhone app also listed. Instructors use a browser interface to enroll students, create evaluation rubrics, and download results for analysis. Rubric scoring and moderation tools support the evaluation process. Students enter an instructor-provided session name to access an evaluation, add written comments, and modify submitted evaluations while the class session remains in progress. PeerEval supports learning management system integration and gradebook synchronization. The software is described as paid, but the maker’s pages do not state plan prices and direct pricing inquiries to the provider. The iPhone app is marked free on the Canadian App Store. Thomas N Robb is identified as its developer and seller. Apple’s listing says the developer has not provided privacy-practice details to Apple. Instructor setup and result downloads stay browser-based, while students complete sessions through the supplied access name.

PeerEval combines rubric-based peer assessment with moderation, comments, and classroom result management. Its web workflow and iPhone listing support different roles, while pricing and privacy details remain limited.

PeerEval suits instructors running classroom peer assessments with rubrics, moderation, and downloadable results. It also fits courses using learning management systems or synchronized gradebooks.

PeerEval is a peer-assessment tool for instructors who want rubric-based evaluations and a browser workflow for managing class results. It is a strong fit for courses that need moderation and gradebook synchronization, but its paid pricing is custom and its iPhone app’s privacy practices are not detailed.

Overview

PeerEval brings student evaluations and instructor administration into a class-session workflow. Instructors can enroll students, build rubrics, and download results for analysis in a browser; students enter an evaluation session using a name supplied by their instructor. That division suits courses where the instructor organizes participation and needs to work with the resulting assessments.

Key features

Rubrics, comments, and moderation

Instructors create rubric-based evaluations through the browser, while students can add written comments and edit submissions during the class session. The editing window gives students room to revise while the session is active, but does not promise changes afterward. Moderation tools add instructor oversight to peer scoring, which matters when evaluations need review rather than automatic acceptance.

Course administration and results

Instructors can enroll students and download results for analysis. PeerEval also supports learning management system integration and gradebook synchronization, making it relevant to courses that need assessment results to connect with existing academic workflows. The available capabilities do not establish how those integrations are configured or which systems are supported.

Pricing

PeerEval is paid, with custom pricing. No plan prices are stated, so instructors should request a quote before deciding whether it fits a course budget. The maker’s pages do not state plan tiers, seat limits, quotas, trial length, or renewal terms; there is no published free plan to assess against those constraints.

The iPhone app is marked free on the Canadian App Store, but that does not make the overall service free: PeerEval’s pricing model is paid. The app listing identifies Thomas N Robb as developer and seller.

Platforms

PeerEval runs on the web and is also listed for iPhone. The browser is the substantive instructor workspace for enrollment, rubric creation, and result downloads. The iPhone listing describes students accessing a session with an instructor-provided name; it does not establish that instructors can perform their browser-based tasks in the app.

Apple’s listing says the developer has not provided details about the app’s privacy practices to Apple. That is a meaningful consideration for students and institutions weighing a mobile app in a classroom setting.

Who it's for

PeerEval is best suited to instructors who want rubric-based peer assessment with moderation, comments, in-session editing, and a way to move results into course workflows. It is less compelling for buyers who need transparent plan costs or published class and student caps before procurement, or for institutions that require clear app privacy disclosures before adoption.

Pros and cons

• Pro: Rubrics, moderation, written comments, and instructor enrollment tools support a structured peer-assessment process rather than bare score collection.
• Pro: Gradebook synchronization and LMS integration can help fit peer assessment into established course administration.
• Con: Custom pricing and the absence of published plan limits make budgeting and capacity comparisons difficult.
• Con: Students can edit evaluations only during the class session, limiting revision to that window.
• Con: Apple’s listing says the developer has not provided privacy-practice details, a concern for classroom app adoption.

Alternatives

Peer Assessment Software is a useful starting point for comparing tools in this category. Choose Marka instead if a free entry point and Android support matter: its Basic plan covers up to three classes and 50 students per class, with full report preview only.

PeerAssessment.com is worth considering if a free trial and support for Android, iOS, and web are priorities; its trial covers one class, one term, one instructor, up to 100 students, and up to 12 assessments. For a web-only option with a free instructor-sponsored plan capped at 20 students per assignment, consider CrowdGrader.

Kritik360 may suit educators seeking free professor access with account and course activation, instructional design, and ongoing support. Eli Review offers instructors unlimited courses and all platform features at no charge, with student access sold separately. Student Peer Review is another web option: its free plan lasts six months and includes one course, 50 students, and 10 assessments.

PeerEvals and TEAMMATES are free web alternatives for readers comparing no-cost options.

Verdict

Choose PeerEval if your course needs moderated, rubric-based peer evaluation and instructor tools for managing and exporting results, with LMS and gradebook support. Its principal advantage is the combination of assessment workflow and course administration; its main drawbacks are custom pricing and limited privacy disclosure for the iPhone app. Buyers who need clear costs before procurement should compare alternatives with published free-plan limits or trial terms.