Litify

Litify is an AI-native legal platform for law firms and corporate legal departments. Its core tools cover client intake, matter and document management, time and billing, legal spend, and reporting. Configurable workflows and AI agents can handle tasks in the background and suggest next steps using role, conversation, and case-file context. Litify ACE supports multi-step workflows and questions across a firm’s caseload, and is accessible in a browser, through a Chrome extension, or via a mobile-friendly web app and voice-to-text. The platform connects with iManage, Google Drive, and SharePoint so users can find and act on external content in a conversation. No-code reports and dashboards track case performance, team productivity, and revenue generation. Document tools include generation, editing, management, and advanced PDF editing. Litify lists integrations such as RingCentral, QuickBooks, DocuSign, Outlook, NetDocuments, and Accounting Seed. The company says its AI does not train on customer data and provides source-traceable outputs. Pricing is on request. Litify is based in New York and was founded in 2016.

Litify brings legal casework management, analytics, and AI workflows into one platform. Prospective customers should request pricing and consider the described support-access process.

Litify suits law firms and corporate legal departments seeking legal casework management, reporting, and AI-assisted workflows. Its stated audiences include personal injury, insurance defense, and immigration practices.

Litify is an AI-native platform for law firms and corporate legal departments managing intake, matters, documents, billing, and reporting. It suits organizations that need connected casework across multiple practice areas and want configurable AI workflows. Its breadth is a strong draw, while custom pricing and a support process that can involve database access call for careful evaluation.

Overview

Litify combines client intake, matter and document management, timekeeping, billing, legal spend management, and analytics in one legal platform. It serves law firms and corporate legal departments across more than 15 practice areas, including personal injury, insurance defense, and immigration, and says it supports more than 70,000 legal professionals.

The breadth can help teams coordinate casework and operational reporting in one environment. Litify also lists integrations with RingCentral, QuickBooks, DocuSign, Outlook, iManage, NetDocuments, and Accounting Seed. That scope is most persuasive for organizations with established workflows; a team seeking only a narrow intake tool may have less use for the wider platform.

Key features

Casework and documents

Intake forms, matter management, document management, time tracking, billing and payments, and legal spend management cover much of the work surrounding a case. Document tools include generation, editing, management, and advanced PDF editing. For firms trying to connect intake through billing, this range can reduce the need to split those tasks across separate systems. The fit depends on whether the organization wants a broad platform rather than a focused document or intake product.

AI workflows and access

Litify ACE supports multi-step workflows and can answer firm-wide questions across a caseload. Configurable agents can work in the background and recommend next steps using role, conversation, and case-file context. ACE is accessible through a browser, Chrome extension, mobile-friendly web app, phone shortcut, and voice-to-text. That makes it relevant to teams that want AI embedded in ongoing legal work, though organizations should assess whether these workflows fit their own processes.

ACE connects to iManage, Google Drive, and SharePoint, allowing users to search, cite, and act on external content from a conversation. Litify says its AI environment is isolated, does not train models on customer data, and produces outputs traceable to sources. It has completed SOC 2 Type I and Type II audits performed by Sensiba. These safeguards matter for legal teams handling sensitive material, while each organization still needs to assess its own security requirements.

Reporting and support

No-code reports and dashboards can be configured for case performance, team productivity, and revenue. Litify says support staff may request database login access to resolve an issue, subject to the customer's access grant and authentication process. That process deserves review by teams with strict access controls.

Pricing

Litify is paid software with custom pricing. Its pricing page invites prospective customers to request a personalized demo, and no product price is stated. The Practice Management Clients plan for law firms describes annual subscription pricing in a maker PDF, while the Enterprise Legal Management Clients plan for corporate and government organizations depends on team size, structure, and features. Neither plan has a published price, so buyers should request a quote tailored to their deployment before comparing costs.

Because the price is custom, organizations cannot use a published rate to judge how costs scale with their team or requirements. The stated plan descriptions provide no seat or usage caps to compare. Litify is therefore a better fit for buyers prepared to evaluate a tailored enterprise purchase than for smaller teams that need a transparent, self-serve price.

Platforms

Litify supports Android, iOS, web, API, and extension access. ACE also works through a Chrome extension and mobile-friendly web access, giving users several ways to reach AI workflows alongside the core platform.

Who it's for

Litify is aimed at law firms and corporate legal departments, including personal injury, insurance defense, and immigration practices. It makes the most sense for organizations that want intake, matters, documents, time and billing, spend, analytics, and AI workflows in a connected system. Teams seeking a narrowly scoped tool or a price they can assess without a sales conversation may prefer a more focused option.

Pros and cons

• Broad legal operations coverage: Intake, matter and document management, time and billing, spend, and reporting sit within one platform.
• Context-aware AI workflows: ACE can handle multi-step work and use case-file, conversation, and role context to recommend next steps.
• External content access: Connections to iManage, Google Drive, and SharePoint support search, citations, and actions from conversations.
• Custom pricing: Buyers need a personalized quote, making upfront cost comparison difficult.
• Support access requires consideration: Resolving some issues may involve granting support database login access through an authentication process.

Alternatives

For firms comparing broader legal practice management options, see Legal Practice Management Software. Readers focused on workflow automation or client-facing access can also compare Legal Workflow Automation Software and Legal Client Portal Software.

BriefBox is worth considering when a free starting point matters: its Core plan is free, and it supports Android, iOS, and web. Intapp Intake is another paid intake option with Android, iOS, and web access; pricing is available by demo request.

PerfectLaw DMS may suit buyers prioritizing document management, with web and on-premises subscription options and support across desktop and mobile platforms. DecisionVault offers published annual-billed monthly prices for Solo and Lite, capped at 10 and 30 matters started per month respectively, plus a free trial.

Mitratech CaseCloud is another paid option with personalized demo pricing. Law Ruler lists a Pro subscription on an annual term, with up to three users and 10,000 contacts. Lawmatics offers a free trial; its Essential plan includes intake, lead management, calendaring, custom forms, e-signature, SMS, and task management for up to 500 contacts. MatterSuite Matter Intake also offers a free trial and describes intake, conflict checks, lifecycle management, timekeeping, expense capture, and billing.

Verdict

Litify is a strong candidate for law firms and corporate legal departments that want casework, operational reporting, and configurable AI workflows under one roof. Its combination of legal operations coverage and access to external repositories is the central reason to consider it. Buyers should look elsewhere if a transparent upfront price or a focused standalone tool is essential, and should review the support access process before adoption.