- Home
- Developer Tools
- Linters
Best Linters 2026
Linters help you check code against rules and surface issues during development or automated workflows. Compared on languages supported, IDE and CI support, the entries offer criteria for assessing where linting can fit in your work. Autofix, custom rules, and security rules provide additional ways to compare how tools address corrections, project conventions, and code checks. Free-plan availability and paid-from pricing add practical considerations. Cppcheck, PMD, and Astral are among the options shown, with Biome and ESLint also represented. Think about the languages and environments your projects use, then weigh those needs against each tool’s listed rule and workflow support.
Flake8
Flake8 suits Python developers who want command-line style and quality checks, configurable error selection, or plugin extensions.
WindowsMacLinux+2JSHint
WebWindowsMac+4Ruff
WebWindowsMac+2Hadolint
Hadolint suits developers and teams maintaining Dockerfiles who want configurable lint rules, structured reports, and CI or editor integration.
WebWindowsMac+1PMD may suit developers and teams seeking a free code analyzer with customizable rules, command-line use, or build and CI integration.
SwiftLint suits Swift developers and teams who want configurable style checks in their editor, build, or CI workflows.
It suits Python developers looking for an open-source linter and package and project management tools across macOS, Linux, or Windows.
Oxc suits developers working with JavaScript and TypeScript who want linting, formatting, and other development tools in one toolchain.
It suits teams reviewing SQL in ELT projects, especially those working across multiple dialects or using Jinja and dbt.
Biome suits people maintaining web projects who want formatting, linting, and import organization in one toolchain.
Checkstyle suits Java programmers and teams that need configurable source-level checks to follow a coding standard.
detekt suits Kotlin developers who want configurable static analysis across supported project types.
HLint suits Haskell developers looking for suggestions about code simplification or redundancy.
golangci-lint suits Go developers who want to run multiple linters and configure their output and analysis through YAML.
It suits C++ developers who want configurable static checks, supported automatic fixes, or custom checks in their workflow.