Sunday, October 25, 2026 4,350 lists 78,100 records on file
List your app or device

  1. Home
  2. Developer Tools
  3. AI Code Review Tools
Ranked on the record · 48 apps

Best AI Code Review Tools 2026

AI code review tools inspect proposed code changes and help teams review, fix, and ship software. This list helps buyers compare review controls, integrations, deployment choices, and ways to try a tool.

The list follows the site's rule: what the maker publishes, with Android availability first, a free way to try, and the freshness of its facts. Use the published fields to compare tools without treating the order as a score.

01

A cloud or self-hosted coding assistant that connects with Git hosts, issue tools and developer editors.

Free plan Free trial WebWindowsMacLinuxBrowser extensionSelf-hosted
02

CodeRabbit

AI code review platform for pull requests with cloud or self-hosted deployment and many integrations.

WebWindowsMac+4
Record6.0 Visit
03

Cubic

Cubic checks pull requests against codebases and team rules, running on web, desktop, Linux and API.

WebWindowsMac+2
Record6.0 Visit
04

DeepSource

AI code review platform for pull requests that runs on web, desktop, API and self-hosted systems.

WebWindowsMac+3
Record6.0 Visit
05

Ellipsis

AI code review tool available through web, API and self-hosted deployments.

WebMacLinux+2
Record5.8 Visit
6
Sourcery

AI code review tool with cloud, self-hosted and desktop options plus editor integrations.

WebWindowsMac+4 $12 a month, billed yearly Record5.8 Visit
7
Revue

A multi-agent reviewer for staged changes and CI pull requests, with six specialist review agents.

WebWindowsLinux+1 $9 a month Record5.6 Visit
8
Octopus

A pull-request reviewer that indexes code, retrieves context and posts severity-rated inline findings.

WebWindowsMac+4 Free plan Record5.5 Visit
9
ThinkReview

ThinkReview adds an AI review sidebar to GitHub, GitLab, Azure DevOps and Bitbucket change pages.

WebWindowsMac+3 $10 a month Record5.5 Visit
10
Greptile

Greptile suits developers and teams seeking automated pull-request reviews, including solo, small and enterprise users.

WebMacLinux+3 $30 a month Record5.4 Visit
11
Mesrai

A multi-agent AI platform that reviews pull requests across repository files using an AST graph.

WebWindowsMac+2 $6 a month Record5.4 Visit
12
Gitar

AI code review service for cloud deployment across Git hosts and CI systems.

WebAPISelf-hosted $20 a month, billed yearly Record5.3 Visit
13
Codacy

Code quality and security platform whose AI Reviewer checks pull requests and suggests fixes.

WebBrowser extension $18 a year Record5.2 Visit
14
LiveReview

LiveReview sorts code changes by blast radius for commits, pushes, merges, pull requests and scheduled checks.

WebWindowsMac+4 $32 a month Record5.2 Visit
15
PR Quorum

PR Quorum is presented for solo developers, agencies, and teams using GitHub pull requests.

WebAPI $115.20 a year Record5.2 Visit
16
CodeKang

It suits development teams that want automated pull-request analysis with human approval before fixes are merged.

WebSelf-hosted $19 a month Record5.0 Visit
17 Web $9 a month Record5.0 Visit
18 WebWindowsMac+3 $30 a month Record5.0 Visit
19
CodeAnt AI

AI code review service for Git providers, editors and self-hosted deployments.

WebBrowser extensionAPI+1 $20 a month Record4.9 Visit
20
Ironwood AI

AI code review tool that uses engineering context and can analyze several repositories together.

WebWindowsMac+1 $15 a month Record4.9 Visit
21
Ito

AI tool that builds and runs isolated behavioral tests for pull requests, then posts QA reports.

Web $40 a month Record4.9 Visit
22
Korbit AI

An AI PR reviewer that flags high-impact issues, explains fixes, responds to comments and writes PR summaries.

WebSelf-hosted Free plan Record4.9 Visit
23 WebMacLinux $1 one-time Record4.9 Visit
24
AI Code Reviewer

Free GitHub Action that posts severity-ranked inline pull request findings and suggestion blocks.

LinuxSelf-hosted Free plan Record4.8 Visit
25
Macroscope

A GitHub-focused service for AI code review, commit intelligence, suggested diffs and automated fix pull requests.

WebAPI — Record4.7 Visit

Before you choose

Compare free access and paid pricing

Check whether a tool has a free plan, a free trial, or both. Paid pricing can differ by user, month, or annual billing.

DeepSource lists a free plan, paid plans from $24 per user per month on annual billing, and a 14-day trial. Sourcery lists paid plans from $12 per user per month and a 14-day trial.

Match the deployment model to your code

The list compares web and self-hosted deployment, plus Linux, macOS, Windows, and API access. A self-hosted option can fit teams that need code review inside their own environment.

Check the platforms a tool publishes before choosing a workflow for local development, hosted review, or automation.

Check how reviews work

Compare security analysis, custom review rules, fix suggestions, and the review trigger. These fields show whether a tool fits policy checks, security-focused review, or automated pull-request feedback.

Look for the controls that match your process instead of assuming tools handle the same review tasks.

Confirm code hosts and SARIF export

Code-host support affects where reviews can run. SARIF export can help move findings into security and code-quality workflows.

Check supported code hosts and SARIF export before adopting a tool for an existing pipeline.

Read the maker's published details

Pricing and product details differ across tools. CodeAnt AI lists plans from $20 per user per month with a 14-day trial, while Ironwood AI lists plans from $15 per month with a 30-day trial.

For tools with pricing on request, such as Gitar, ask the maker for terms before comparing costs.

Questions

Which AI code review tools have a free plan?
The list marks free-plan availability for tools such as DeepSource, Sourcery, CodeRabbit, Codacy, Cubic, Gitar, Greptile, PR Quorum, and PRPilot. Check the current plan terms before choosing.
Can I use a self-hosted AI code review tool?
Self-hosted deployment is one of the compared fields. Review the deployment model for the tool you are considering and confirm its platform requirements.
What review features should I compare?
Compare security analysis, custom review rules, fix suggestions, and review triggers. These fields describe how a tool can fit your review process.
Which integrations are listed?
The comparison includes code-host support and SARIF export, along with web, self-hosted, Linux, macOS, Windows, and API platforms.