Cubic checks pull requests against codebases and team rules, running on web, desktop, Linux and API.
- Home
- Developer Tools
- AI Code Review Tools
Best AI Code Review Tools 2026
Facts read 28 Sep 2026 – 21 Oct 2026
AI code review tools help inspect code changes, flag security issues, apply custom review rules and suggest fixes. This list gives buyers a way to compare those functions with pricing and deployment details.
The standings: top 10
| Name | In a line | Record score | Price from | Try it free | Runs on | Facts read |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 Cubic | Cubic checks pull requests against codebases and team rules, running on web, desktop, Linux and API. | 6.0 | $30 a month, billed yearly | Free plan | Web, Windows, Mac, Linux | 21 Oct 2026 |
| 02 DeepSource | AI code review platform for pull requests, running on web, desktop, API and self-hosted systems. | 6.0 | $30 a month, billed yearly | Free plan | Web, Windows, Mac, Linux | 14 Oct 2026 |
| 03 Bito | Bito supports cloud or self-hosted code review across Git hosts, IDEs and work tools, with SOC 2 compliance. | 5.9 | Free plan | Free plan | Web, Windows, Mac, Linux | 28 Sep 2026 |
| 04 CodeRabbit | AI pull-request review platform with cloud or self-hosted deployment and many integrations. | 5.9 | Free plan | Free plan | Web, Windows, Mac, Linux | 2 Oct 2026 |
| 05 Ellipsis | AI code review tool available through web, API and self-hosted deployments. | 5.8 | Free plan | Free plan | Web, Mac, Linux, API | 15 Oct 2026 |
| 06 Sourcery | AI code review and refactoring tool for web, desktop, IDEs and self-hosted setups. | 5.8 | $12 a month, billed yearly | Free plan | Web, Windows, Mac, Linux | 15 Oct 2026 |
| 07 Revue | Revue uses six specialist agents to inspect staged code and pull or merge requests, then verify findings against lines. | 5.6 | $9 a month | Free plan | Web, Windows, Linux, API | 21 Oct 2026 |
| 08 Octopus | Octopus indexes code and reviews pull requests with severity-rated inline comments through web, desktop, API or self-hosted setups. | 5.5 | Free plan | Free plan | Web, Windows, Mac, Linux | 20 Oct 2026 |
| 09 Greptile | AI code review tool for GitHub, GitLab and coding agents that runs in the cloud or on your own host. | 5.4 | $30 a month | Free plan | Web, Mac, Linux, Browser extension | 15 Oct 2026 |
| 10 ThinkReview | Browser-sidebar AI reviewer for pull and merge requests with editable comments and follow-up questions. | 5.4 | $10 a month | Free plan | Web, Windows, Mac, Linux | 4 Oct 2026 |
Use the comparison fields to check free plans, paid starting prices, review triggers, code hosts and SARIF export. No ranking basis is published yet, so treat the list as a side-by-side reference.
DeepSource
AI code review platform for pull requests, running on web, desktop, API and self-hosted systems.
WebWindowsMac+3Bito
Bito supports cloud or self-hosted code review across Git hosts, IDEs and work tools, with SOC 2 compliance.
WebWindowsMac+3CodeRabbit
AI pull-request review platform with cloud or self-hosted deployment and many integrations.
WebWindowsMac+4Ellipsis
AI code review tool available through web, API and self-hosted deployments.
WebMacLinux+2AI code review and refactoring tool for web, desktop, IDEs and self-hosted setups.
Revue uses six specialist agents to inspect staged code and pull or merge requests, then verify findings against lines.
Octopus indexes code and reviews pull requests with severity-rated inline comments through web, desktop, API or self-hosted setups.
AI code review tool for GitHub, GitLab and coding agents that runs in the cloud or on your own host.
Browser-sidebar AI reviewer for pull and merge requests with editable comments and follow-up questions.
Mesrai uses multi-agent reviews and an AST graph to find cross-file bugs, security, performance and architecture issues.
Code quality and security platform with AI pull-request reviews, summaries and fix suggestions.
AI code review platform that ranks changes by blast radius and scans commits across review workflows.
GitHub App that uses configurable AI reviewers to post one focused pull-request review.
Pullora is a web service that reviews pull requests with selectable modes and preview posting.
AI code review service for cloud or self-hosted use across code hosts, editors and team tools.
It suits development teams that want automated pull-request analysis with human approval before fixes are merged.
AI-assisted code reviewer that uses engineering context and can analyze several repositories together.
Pull-request QA tool that builds isolated app copies and runs execution-based behavioral tests.
Korbit reviews pull requests in real time, explains bug fixes, flags high-impact issues and can provide replacement code.
Qodo provides cloud or self-hosted code review across Git hosts, IDEs and project tools with SOC 2 and GDPR support.
Open-source GitHub Action that posts severity-rated inline pull-request findings and suggestions.
Macroscope reviews GitHub pull requests, posts comments and diffs, and can open fix pull requests until CI passes.
Before you choose
Check the free route and paid price
Free-plan availability varies by tool. DeepSource, Sourcery, CodeRabbit, Codacy, Cubic, Greptile, PR Quorum and ThinkReview list a free plan, while CodeAnt AI lists a paid plan.
Published starting prices also differ. Sourcery lists $12 per user per month, Codacy lists $18 per user per month on annual billing, and Cubic lists $30 per month on annual billing.
Look for a trial period
A free trial can provide a separate way to evaluate a paid plan. DeepSource, Sourcery, CodeRabbit and Codacy list 14-day trials.
Other trial terms appear on the list too. Ironwood AI lists a 30-day trial, while Cubic lists a free plan without a trial in its pricing note.
Match the deployment model to your code
The comparison covers web, self-hosted, Linux, API, macOS and Windows platforms. Check the platform entry against the environment where your code and review workflow run.
Deployment model is a separate comparison field, so review that entry before choosing between a hosted service and a self-hosted setup.
Compare review controls and fixes
Security analysis, custom review rules and fix suggestions are listed comparison fields. Check which controls fit the checks you want to apply to code changes.
Review trigger is also compared. Use that field to see how a tool starts a review within your workflow.
Check code hosts and SARIF
Code host support can affect how a tool fits your repositories. SARIF export can matter when findings need to move into a compatible security or analysis workflow.
Review the code-host and SARIF entries for the tool you are considering rather than assuming support from its platform label.