Kameleo

Kameleo is an anti-detect browser for web scraping, browser automation, and managing multiple accounts. Its Chroma and Junglefox browsers mask fingerprints for Chrome, Edge, Firefox, and Safari profiles, while desktop users can emulate Android and iOS browser behavior. Automation supports Selenium, Puppeteer, and Playwright scripts, as well as a Local API with Python, JavaScript, and C# SDKs. Profiles can use HTTP, HTTPS, SOCKS5, and SSH proxies. Local profiles are unlimited; the Free plan includes 100 cloud profiles, and paid plans include at least 5,000. Paid plans provide unlimited team seats and role-based access controls for cloud profiles. Kameleo lists Windows, macOS, Linux, web, Android, iOS, API, and extension platforms, with Docker images for Linux and Windows containers. The Free plan is €0.00 per free and includes two concurrent browsers, 300 minutes of browser use, two emulated mobile browsers, and three team members. Startup is €45.00 per year on annual billing or €59.00 per month billed monthly.

Kameleo combines fingerprint masking, mobile emulation, automation integrations, and profile management. The Free plan has specific usage limits, while team seats and higher profile counts are available with paid plans.

Kameleo suits users who need browser automation, web scraping, or multiple browser profiles. Its automation integrations and team controls may be useful to people coordinating that work across a team.

Kameleo is an anti-detect browser for scraping, browser automation, and managing multiple accounts. It best suits technical users and teams that need browser-profile capacity, mobile emulation, and automation integrations. Its breadth is a strength, but the Free plan’s time and concurrency caps make it a constrained way to run sustained work.

Overview

Kameleo combines fingerprint-masked browser profiles with desktop emulation of Android and iOS browser behavior. Profiles can use HTTP, HTTPS, SOCKS5, or SSH proxies, and cloud profiles sync across devices. Local profiles are unlimited; the Free plan allows 100 cloud profiles, while paid tiers include at least 5,000.

Its Chroma and Junglefox browsers cover Chrome, Edge, Firefox, and Safari profiles. Automation can use Selenium, Puppeteer, or Playwright scripts, or the Local API with Python, JavaScript, and C# SDKs. Official Docker images are available for Linux and Windows containers. This is a specialized toolkit, not a general-purpose browser for everyday browsing.

Key features

• Fingerprint masking: The browser options and profile controls suit workflows that need distinct browser identities across supported profiles. That breadth is useful, but buyers should weigh it against the operational complexity of an anti-detect tool.
• Mobile emulation: Emulate Android and iOS browser behavior from a desktop. Free includes two emulated mobile browsers; Startup includes 10+, while Business and Enterprise allow unlimited emulation. The paid limits make more sense for workflows that need several mobile environments concurrently.
• Automation: Selenium, Puppeteer, and Playwright support plus SDKs for three languages offer flexibility for scripted workflows. The API throughput ceiling varies by tier, so high-volume automation needs to account for that limit.
• Profiles and teams: Free offers 100 cloud profiles and three team members. Paid plans include 5,000 or more cloud profiles and unlimited team seats with role-based access controls. That makes paid tiers materially better suited to shared profile libraries.
• Proxy and deployment options: HTTP, HTTPS, SOCKS5, and SSH proxies cover common connection types; Docker images support Linux and Windows containers. These options favor users with established technical workflows over casual users seeking a simple standalone browser.

Pricing

The Free plan costs nothing and includes two concurrent browsers, 300 minutes of browser usage, 100 cloud profiles, two emulated mobile browsers, and three team members. It is a useful way to start, but the minute allowance and low concurrency cap make it unsuitable for sustained or team-scale work.

Startup costs €45 a year when billed annually or €59 a month when billed monthly. It raises capacity to 10 concurrent browsers, 5,000 cloud profiles, 10+ emulated mobile browsers, unlimited browser usage time, and unlimited team members. It is the practical entry point for regular work that outgrows Free.

Business costs €225 a year when billed annually or €299 a month when billed monthly. It provides 100 concurrent browsers, unlimited emulated mobile browsers, unlimited browser usage time, 5,000 cloud profiles, and unlimited team members. This tier is aimed at larger concurrent workloads rather than occasional use.

Enterprise costs €1,125 a year when billed annually and includes 1,000 concurrent browsers, unlimited browser usage time and mobile emulation, 5,000+ cloud profiles, and a customizable package. It also includes a 60-minute expert call. Customers can contact the customer success team through the Support Center.

API throughput is 60, 120, 600, or 1,200 requests per minute depending on tier; other endpoints are described as unlimited. Check the applicable throughput before choosing a plan for API-heavy automation.

Platforms

Kameleo lists Android, iOS, Linux, macOS, Windows, web, API, and extension platforms, with cross-device sync for cloud profiles. Supported desktop downloads include Windows 10+, Windows Server 2016+, macOS 12+, and Docker environments. Mobile behavior can be emulated from a desktop, which is distinct from running that emulation directly on a phone.

Who it's for

Kameleo is a strong fit for technically minded individuals or teams that need automation integrations, multiple browser-profile types, proxy choices, and synced cloud profiles. Startup offers a substantial jump over Free for recurring use; Business and Enterprise make sense when concurrency, mobile emulation, or profile capacity needs scale. Casual browsing and light experiments are poorer fits for a product whose value centers on specialized profile management and whose free usage time is capped.

Pros and cons

Pros

• Broad automation support: Selenium, Puppeteer, Playwright, and Local API SDKs cover several established scripting approaches.
• Flexible profile capacity: Unlimited local profiles and synced cloud profiles let users choose between local storage and shared access.
• Scales across tiers: Paid plans expand concurrent browsers and mobile emulation substantially, with unlimited team seats.

Cons

• Free use is tightly bounded: 300 minutes, two concurrent browsers, and two emulated mobile browsers limit sustained evaluation.
• Meaningful shared capacity costs: The 100-profile Free cloud allowance rises to 5,000 on Startup, which is a major tier jump for teams needing a shared library.
• API throughput is tier-dependent: The stated ceiling ranges from 60 to 1,200 requests per minute, a constraint for high-volume workflows.

Alternatives

1Browser is another freemium option, with Windows, macOS, Linux, and Android support; its Free plan has 10 profiles, limited proxy countries, and basic browser speed. GoLogin is worth comparing if a no-time-limit free option with three profiles is more important than Kameleo's larger Free cloud allowance. Hidemium has a free plan with five profiles and one device, a leaner starting point for users whose needs fit those limits.

MoreLogin offers a free plan with two profiles, two users, Chrome and Firefox, Local API, and Selenium/Puppeteer automation. AdsPower has a two-profile Free plan and paid profile-count options. GeeLark has a Free tier with two profiles, 30 bonus minutes, and one seat, while its Base tier starts at $5 a month. AntiProfiles offers a free tier with three profiles, basic proxy and fingerprint controls, and no API. BitBrowser is another option to compare for its free profile and member allowances.

For broader category comparisons, see Anti-Detect Browser Software, Browser Automation Tools, and Web browsers.

Verdict

Choose Kameleo if your work depends on combining masked browser profiles, desktop mobile emulation, and established automation integrations, especially across a team or a substantial concurrent workload. Its main advantage is how much of that workflow it brings together; its main reason to look elsewhere is the Free plan’s tight operating caps and the cost of scaling profile and concurrency capacity.