Fronty

Fronty creates HTML and CSS websites from prompts, screenshots, designs, existing URLs, starter templates, or a blank start. Its AI editor can also revise a real page from natural-language instructions. In the online visual editor, users click page elements to edit them, adjust layouts, preview responsive views, and use history and autosave without installing software. Fronty includes structured website tables, dynamic content, and forms, with submissions appearing in a dashboard inbox. Users can publish with managed hosting and HTTPS, connect a custom domain on paid plans, or download a ZIP of HTML to host elsewhere. It describes capabilities including page titles and descriptions, clean URLs, an updating sitemap, semantic headings, and labelled controls. Responsive HTML/CSS output is supported, but Figma import is not. The free plan is free and publishes to a fronty.live address with Fronty branding; page and usage allowances vary by plan. Documentation marks forms, dynamic content, and publishing as limited or in rollout.

Fronty combines AI-assisted generation, visual editing, site publishing, and code export. Its free plan includes branding, and documentation notes limits on several capabilities.

Fronty suits people creating and editing websites without code, including teams using owner, admin, editor, or viewer roles. It offers both managed publishing and code export for hosting elsewhere.

Overview

Fronty is a website-building platform that turns prompts and visual references into editable pages, then offers publishing and code export. It suits people who want to create a small site without code while keeping the option to host the exported HTML elsewhere.

The mix of generation, visual editing and publishing is useful, but limits on forms, dynamic content and publishing make Fronty a less compelling choice for sites that depend on extensive data-driven workflows.

Key features

Users can start with a prompt, screenshot, design, existing URL, template or blank page. An AI editor can revise a page from natural-language instructions, while the visual editor lets users click page elements and adjust them in a canvas with layout controls, responsive preview, history and autosave. That range makes it practical to move from reference to iteration in one browser-based workflow. Figma import is not supported, so teams whose design handoff depends on importing Figma files will need another route.

Fronty adds structured website tables and forms to page creation, with submissions appearing in a dashboard inbox. That is more useful than a static-page-only builder for basic site interactions, but the documented limits on forms and submissions—and on dynamic content and item pages—are a reason not to rely on it for complex data or form operations.

Publishing includes managed hosting, custom-domain availability on paid plans, automatic HTTPS certificates and backups. The platform also describes SEO and accessibility features such as page titles, descriptions, clean URLs, an updating sitemap, semantic headings and labelled controls. For users who want to retain control of hosting, ZIP export provides standalone HTML and CSS with responsive code. The export is capped at 200 non-deleted pages, uses English as the document language and may retain CDN dependencies, so it is not an unrestricted, dependency-free handoff.

Fronty supports team roles for owners, admins, editors and viewers. Its documented integrations include business-email DNS checks and map, video, chart, calendar and checkout components, but there is no general webhook, Zapier, Make or CRM connection path. That keeps common embedded components in reach while limiting broader workflow integration.

Fronty says it encrypts data in transit and uses access controls, logging, abuse monitoring, rate limits, anti-bot checks and hosted-content security scanning. It says customer content is not sold or used to train third-party foundation models, though AI providers may retain inputs and outputs for limited periods under their terms. Its documentation directs account-specific issues to support and recommends including the site, page, public URL, expected and actual result, and incident time.

Pricing

Fronty's Free plan costs nothing and publishes to a fronty.live address with Fronty branding. Page and usage allowances vary by plan, so the free tier is best treated as a way to begin a branded site rather than a guaranteed fit for a larger project. Paid plans include custom-domain availability, but their prices are custom pricing.

The free plan gives up the custom-domain option available on paid plans. Fronty also labels publishing a limited rollout, which matters if a project depends on a predictable publishing workflow. Review the applicable page and usage allowances before committing a site to the service.

Platforms

Fronty is available on web and via API. Its online visual editor requires no software installation. Exported HTML and CSS can be hosted elsewhere, though exports retain the stated page cap and may include CDN dependencies.

Who it's for

Fronty is a good fit for individuals and small teams creating straightforward websites from a prompt, screenshot or existing page, especially when visual edits and managed publishing matter more than extensive integrations. It is less suitable for Figma-led handoffs, high-volume forms, complex dynamic content or workflows that require CRM and automation connections.

Pros and cons

Pros

• Multiple starting points, including screenshots and URLs, let users build from existing visual references rather than only from a blank page.
• Natural-language editing and click-to-edit controls support both AI-assisted revisions and direct page adjustments in the browser.
• Managed hosting, custom domains on paid plans, HTTPS and backups bring core publishing needs together.
• ZIP export offers a route to external hosting, and the exported code is responsive.

Cons

• The free site carries Fronty branding and uses a fronty.live address, limiting its appeal for a polished branded launch.
• Forms, submissions, dynamic content and item pages have documented limits, which constrains data-driven projects.
• Publishing is described as a limited rollout, making it a weaker choice where publishing availability must be dependable.
• Exports cap at 200 non-deleted pages, use English as the document language and may retain CDN dependencies.
• No Figma import or general webhook, Zapier, Make or CRM connection path is documented.

Alternatives

Choose v0 if its published Free plan's 7 messages/day, Vercel deployment, Design Mode and GitHub sync better match an app-building workflow. Choose Figma Make if a Figma-centered workflow and its stated AI-credit plans are a better fit. Alloy, Anima, Builder.io, CoderUI, Codia AI and Kombai are other options to compare.

For more tools built around image-to-code workflows, browse AI Screenshot-to-Code Tools.

Verdict

Choose Fronty if you want a no-code path from a prompt or visual reference to an editable, hosted website, with HTML and CSS to take elsewhere. Its strongest case is the combination of generation, browser editing and publishing; look elsewhere if your project needs robust forms, unrestricted publishing, broad automation links or a Figma import workflow.