Evinced

Evinced offers accessibility tools for teams building websites and mobile apps. Its products help find, group, track, and prevent accessibility issues, using rule sets, computer vision, AI, and other algorithms. Test Automation SDKs support web and mobile apps and work with frameworks including Playwright, Selenium, Cypress, WebdriverIO, XCUITest, Espresso, and Appium. CI connections include Jenkins and CircleCI, with JSON, JUnit, and CSV output. Site Scanner crawls websites, tracks issues over time, and can scan pages that require login; it can also test on-premises development, QA, and staging environments through outbound HTTPS connections. Web Flow Analyzer follows user journeys, produces reports, and can create Jira or Azure DevOps tickets. Mobile Flow Analyzer checks apps on real or simulated devices without SDK installation or code-level access. Other offerings include a Figma design checker, chatbot integrations, and MCP tools for compatible AI coding systems. Pricing is on request. A listed Site Scanner trial lasts 14 days and requires no credit card; it covers up to 50,000 URLs crawled and scanned, with a 1,500-page limit per scan.

Evinced brings accessibility checks into design, testing, site scanning, and development workflows. Teams can review the trial limits and request pricing to assess fit.

Evinced may suit designers, developers, QA teams, and managers working on accessible web and mobile products. Its tools also address teams incorporating accessibility checks into UI tests, CI systems, or design workflows.

Overview

Evinced is a suite of accessibility tools for web and mobile products, covering design review, automated testing, journey analysis, and site scanning. It is best suited to product teams that want accessibility checks to sit within existing design, QA, development, and issue-tracking workflows. Its breadth is useful, but teams should weigh custom pricing against a 14-day trial with firm scan limits.

Key features

Evinced combines rule sets, computer vision, AI, and other algorithms to detect accessibility problems, including complex issues. It groups findings that share code patterns, which can help teams focus on a smaller number of underlying components rather than treating every report as a separate fix. That organization is most useful when teams can act on shared-code fixes; detection alone does not resolve defects.

Test Automation SDKs connect checks to web and mobile UI tests. Web frameworks include Playwright, Selenium, Cypress, WebdriverIO, and TestCafe; mobile frameworks include XCUITest, Espresso, and Appium. Jenkins and CircleCI integrations and JSON, JUnit, and CSV output make the SDKs a natural fit for teams with established CI pipelines. Teams without automated UI tests may find the SDK route less useful.

Web Flow Analyzer, a Chrome plugin, follows a user journey and produces a report for that flow. It can create Jira and Azure DevOps tickets; Jira issues can include screenshots and relevant code. This connects findings to remediation work, though the flow-based scope is not a substitute for scanning an entire site.

Site Scanner crawls websites, tracks issues over time, and can reach pages behind a login. It can test on-premises development, QA, and staging environments from a data center using outbound HTTPS connections only, a practical option for teams that need to scan non-public environments. Mobile Flow Analyzer is a Windows and macOS desktop app for testing Android and iOS apps on real or simulated devices without SDK installation or code-level access. Its filterable issue lists can be exported as HTML or JSON.

Design Assistant checks Figma designs and gives developers implementation guidance and a model unit test. Evinced also offers chatbot access through Slack, Microsoft Teams, and Visual Studio, plus MCP tools for compatible AI coding systems including GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Claude, and Continue. The MCP tools can run in Evinced's cloud or a private cloud; Evinced describes them as SOC 2 Type II compliant. Hosted deployment options include single- and multi-tenant Google Cloud environments, as well as on-premise deployment in a customer's cloud environment.

Evinced Learn provides free online accessibility courses for web developers, mobile developers, and designers. That is a useful learning resource alongside the paid product, but it is not a free plan for the testing suite.

Pricing

Evinced is paid, with pricing on request and a 14-day trial. The Site Scanner Free Trial costs nothing for 14 days, requires no credit card, and allows up to 50,000 URLs crawled and 50,000 URLs scanned across multiple scans and domains or subdomains. Each scan is capped at 1,500 pages. The trial is a meaningful way to assess scanning across a large site, but the per-scan ceiling may require splitting work, and it does not establish the ongoing cost. There is no free plan.

Platforms

Evinced supports Android, iOS, macOS, Windows, web, API, browser extensions, and self-hosted deployment. The Chrome-based Web Flow Analyzer and Windows/macOS Mobile Flow Analyzer address different testing contexts, while the SDK and API options suit teams integrating checks into their own workflows. WCAG support is listed at version 2.1.

Who it's for

Evinced is a strong fit for organizations with designers, developers, QA teams, and managers who need accessibility work across design files, automated tests, user journeys, mobile apps, and full-site scans. Teams with existing CI and issue-tracking processes can make more use of its integrations. Smaller teams seeking a clearly priced entry tier, or teams that only need occasional lightweight checks, should compare lower-commitment options before requesting a quote.

Pros and cons

• Pro: Web, mobile, design, and site-scanning tools cover multiple stages of product work, reducing the need to treat each stage as a separate accessibility workflow.
• Pro: Pattern-based issue grouping can point teams toward shared components whose fixes may address multiple findings.
• Pro: Mobile Flow Analyzer tests real or simulated devices without SDK installation or code access, lowering setup demands for app analysis.
• Con: Ongoing pricing is custom, so teams cannot readily compare a published subscription price before engaging the maker.
• Con: The trial lasts 14 days and caps each scan at 1,500 pages, which may complicate evaluation of large sites.
• Con: Several tools derive their value from existing design, UI-test, CI, or ticketing workflows; teams without those processes may use less of the suite.

Alternatives

Website Accessibility Tools and Accessibility Testing Software are useful starting points for comparing the broader categories.

• Level Access Platform is another paid option with Android, iOS, web, API, and extension support; its pricing is by demo request.
• Siteimprove Accessibility suits organizations seeking tailored pricing based on their sites and goals, and supports Android, iOS, web, API, and extensions.
• axe Auditor is another paid alternative spanning Android, iOS, macOS, web, and Windows, with pricing handled through a demo.
• Assistiv Labs is worth considering when a published entry price and free plan matter: its Freelancer plan is $19 a month for 120 testing minutes, one user, and one parallel test.
• Allyant Accessibility Management Platform is another paid option, with pricing handled through a demo request.
• Stark may suit teams looking for a freemium option; its Premium Pack is $198 a year and includes automated detection and remediation tooling for Figma and browser WCAG scans and reports.
• WAVE is a freemium alternative with extension, API, and desktop platform support; its Subscription API starts at $10 a month for a 250-credit minimum purchase.
• pour is a free alternative with all tools, no accounts, no subscriptions, and no paid tiers.

Verdict

Choose Evinced if your organization needs accessibility checks across design, web and mobile testing, CI, and site scanning, especially when pattern grouping and integration with existing workflows matter. The strongest reason to look elsewhere is the combination of custom ongoing pricing and a short, page-limited trial; teams needing a predictable low-cost starting point should compare freemium or published-price alternatives first.